From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastien Vauban" Subject: Re: Selectively export RESULTS Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 00:01:48 +0100 Message-ID: <80k431e1b7.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <87ty2aw7ps.fsf@tajo.ucsd.edu> <87ty29eg8n.fsf@tajo.ucsd.edu> <87boohbmch.fsf@gmx.com> <8762epz8uh.fsf@tajo.ucsd.edu> <87mx7ynbbm.fsf@gmx.com> <87399qn6ft.fsf@gmx.com> <4F5129B9.2070800@isciences.com> <87hay6lpey.fsf@gmx.com> <80wr72dkx3.fsf@somewhere.org> <87obsdpwhw.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hi Achim, Achim Gratz wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" writes: >>> You can also press C-c C-c on the #+Property line to apply it's effects. >> >> Everybody seems to get bitten by this at least once. Would there be a >> possibility to avoid this extra step for the user, and have such parameters >> automagically taken into account, without user involvement? > > I really wouldn't want that, but maybe PROPERTY lines that are out of > sync with the effective properties could be highlighted? Not sure to understand why you would prefer to have something that you just wrote not taken into account, unlike one would expect? Anyway, be it set or just shown, that means that a check would have to be done at each babel evaluation of the buffer. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban