From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bert Burgemeister Subject: Re: [Accepted] Making the output of %% functions linkable in agenda views Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 09:57:34 +0200 Message-ID: <80fwongf81.fsf@ID-264851.user.dfncis.de> References: <87aaf3tv5l.fsf@fastmail.fm> <20110504074311.96ACF43B354@u016822.science.uva.nl> <80ei4c5kvp.fsf@ID-264851.user.dfncis.de> <87aaf0oxsw.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87wri2h704.fsf@ID-264851.user.dfncis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39166) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJhpN-0002Q4-FZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 03:57:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJhpJ-0005fw-An for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 03:57:57 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:59965) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJhpJ-0005fU-5B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 03:57:53 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJhpF-0000QI-2a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 09:57:49 +0200 Received: from 141.30.183.169 ([141.30.183.169]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 09:57:49 +0200 Received: from trebbu by 141.30.183.169 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 09:57:49 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik writes: > On 7.5.2011, at 17:20, Bert Burgemeister wrote: > >> Matt Lundin writes: >> >>> Bert Burgemeister writes: >>> >>>> Just curious, is there anything I should have known that prevented the >>>> patch submitted in http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/39313, >>> >>> Is it still in the bugtracker, or was it rejected? >> >> Yes, and no. >> >>> With your patch, what would happen if there were two or more links in >>> the headline? >>> >>> * Two links >>> %%(format "%s" (concat "[[elisp:(info)]" "[Link to info]]")) >>> http://www.orgmode.org >>> >>> This entry would show up in the agenda as: >>> >>> org: [[elisp:(info)][Link to info]] >>> >>> But AFAICT, hitting C-c C-o in the agenda-buffer (even on the elisp >>> link) would jump immediately to http://www.orgmode.org, bypassing the >>> opportunity to select the the %%(...) generated link. >> >> That's true and your patch reduces org-mode's LOC, so you win. > > Hi Bert, > > does this mean > > http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/681/ > > is now obsolete? It doesn't fix any issues I'm aware of, so you could consider it obsolete. But on the other hand, it still makes org-agenda-open-link a bit more robust as it makes the cond try the remaining clauses if the first one doesn't succeed. -- Bert