From: "Sebastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgwmuf-geNee64TY+gS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: indenting nested TODOs in agenda views
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 14:26:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80fwktaazj.fsf@somewhere.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87aab1fym8.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net
Hi Eric,
Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22 2011, Bernt Hansen wrote:
>
>> Eric Abrahamsen <eric-5ibeKGLO59aIK5dEoMBc7KxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org> writes:
>>
>>> What would it take to get an Agenda tags view that indented nested
>>> TODOs? I've always been bothered by the fact that nested TODOs within a
>>> subtree are all flattened for the agenda view, so sometimes it's hard to
>>> tell that several TODOs all belong to one "bigger" TODO.
>>>
>>> I guess it would have to go in `org-finalize-agenda-entries', after the
>>> filter function is run, and somehow instead of the way org entries are
>>> currently fed to the sorting function. Would this be a desirable option?
>>
>> Set
>>
>> (org-tags-match-list-sublevels 'indented)
>>
>> in your agenda view.
>
> That's pretty interesting, but not quite what I meant: I was thinking
> that TODOs would be first sorted by outline level, and then only TODOs
> that belonged to a subtree with "higher" TODOs would be indented. With
> "indented", a second-level TODO can come after a first-level TODO and
> appear to be subordinate to it, though they belong to completely
> different subtrees.
>
> But stating the problem this way makes me realize it's more complicated
> than I thought…
Just an incentive to tell you I'd also would love that feature.
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-22 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-22 11:16 indenting nested TODOs in agenda views Eric Abrahamsen
2011-08-22 11:37 ` Bernt Hansen
2011-08-22 11:56 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2011-08-22 12:26 ` Sebastien Vauban [this message]
2011-08-22 13:50 ` Olivier Schwander
2011-08-22 14:02 ` Jason Dunsmore
2011-08-22 14:06 ` John Hendy
2011-08-22 14:24 ` Sebastien Vauban
2011-08-22 16:29 ` Achim Gratz
2011-08-23 9:10 ` Eric Abrahamsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80fwktaazj.fsf@somewhere.org \
--to=wxhgmqzgwmuf-genee64ty+gs+fvcfc7uqw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).