Re: Bug: Extra space inserted in repeated tasks' date line

["Sebastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgwmuf-geNee64TY+gS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>]

Hi Bastien,

Bastien wrote:
> "Sebastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgwmuf-geNee64TY+gS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org> writes:
>
>> ** This one won't be moved along with the heading
>>   SCHEDULED: <2011-08-18 Thu>
>>
>> Because of this text here...
>
> This should be fixed now.  "Meta" lines (SCHEDULED string, etc, 
> along with the first properties drawer) will be indented correctly,
> even when text from the subtree start at the beginning of the line.
>
> Please confirm this works okay for you, and thanks for reporting 
> this!

This works in many cases, but suffers some problems. Anyway, you're really not
far from giving this a definitive solution[1].

Here a compilation of cases which don't work, or work with an error being
generated in the echo area.

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* New section

The first one works, but generates an error ("setq: Wrong type argument:
number-or-marker-p, nil").

** The SCHED will be moved
   SCHEDULED: <2011-08-18 Thu>

** This one now move as well along with the heading
   SCHEDULED: <2011-08-18 Thu>

Even with this text here... but error is also generated.

Same for the following: works, with error.

** RDV client
   DEADLINE: <2011-09-06 Tue 08:30-09:15>

** Feestje Iris
   <2011-08-14 Sun 18:30>

Demoting this one does not move the active timestamp, but moves the SCHEDULED
line of the next entry.

** TODO Bi-weekly review
   SCHEDULED: <2011-08-12 Fri ++14d>
   :PROPERTIES:
   :RESET_CHECK_BOXES: t:
   :LAST_REPEAT: [2009-07-28 Tue 21:19]
   :END:

Here, the properties aren't moved. The rest well.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Thank you so much for patching this. It will save me tens of minutes per
month, and an RSI because of adding them manually? ;-)

Best regards,
  Seb

Footnotes:

[1] I've been sure for months that this worked before (like some half year
    ago), but never tried on such a vintage version. Anyway, Carsten told me I
    was wrong...

-- 
Sebastien Vauban