From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastien Vauban" Subject: Re: Bug: Column view in the agenda does not clean up ITEM [7.7] Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:49:18 +0200 Message-ID: <80aabhavy9.fsf@somewhere.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hi Christian, Christian Schmidt wrote: > I found out why the tags are still there in my column view directly > in org-buffer: You are using "TAGS" for the column with the tags. I > am using "ALLTAGS" instead, because I want to see the inherited tags > as well. Unfortunately the column view does not treat the column > ALLTAGS the same way it does treat the column TAGS (another bug?). > When I use TAGS instead, the tag is removed as well, like at yours. > But only when C-c C-x C-c is called directly on the _org-buffer_. Yes, I did ask for column view on the source Org buffer. > I still got the following issue, even with your configuration: > > C-c a L gives me the following agenda-buffer: > > Sonntag 7 August 2011 > Scheduled: NEXTACTION [#B] Test > Montag 8 August 2011 W32 > Dienstag 9 August 2011 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Mittwoch 10 August 2011 > > Now I invoke in the same buffer, i. e. agenda-buffer, C-c C-x C-c and > get: > > NEXTACTION | B | NEXTACTION [#B] Test :Tag: | :Tag: | | | 2011-08-07 So | > > Unfortunately still nothing gets cleaned up. > > Looking at your screenshot I wonder if the lower buffer does really > show an Org-Agenda buffer after invoking C-c C-x C-c. You're right. I did not understand -- maybe read too quickly -- that your problem was when asking for column view _from the timeline view_. I just tested it. I get the exact same behavior as the one you describe here; unfortunately, then, I'm of no help. Quick question: do you really need to call column view from within a timeline. Isn't there a workaround to get the same lot of information, without going to the timeline? Not sure about your use case... But, yes, this sounds to me buggy as well. Maybe that's a corner case? Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban