From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Subject: Re: Table cell refs with @0 or $0 are broken
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 14:13:04 -0400
Message-ID: <8096.1333995184@alphaville>
References: <874nszzvoe.wl%jamshark70@dewdrop-world.net>
	<5119.1333559874@alphaville> <4F7CADF9.8070609@christianmoe.com>
	<8925.1333573540@alphaville> <4F7CB96C.6040109@christianmoe.com>
	<11420.1333578991@alphaville> <878vi4g4n8.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34789)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1SHJ5h-0001II-NT
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 14:13:26 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1SHJ5g-00011k-3X
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 14:13:25 -0400
In-Reply-To: Message from Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
	of "Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:07:55 +0200." <878vi4g4n8.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: jamshark70@gmail.com, Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, mail@christianmoe.com

Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> wrote:

> As for the OT's issue, IIUC this is more a documentation issue?
> 

I don't think so, but I'm not quite sure: the code fix should take
care of it I think.

Nick

> Can anyone submit a doc patch for improving the doc here?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
>  Bastien
>