From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastien Vauban" Subject: Re: Journal versus clock tables: Opposing requirements? Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 11:05:31 +0100 Message-ID: <8062ivlyj8.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <87obwogo1c.fsf@rat.lan> <87bosngf3t.fsf@rat.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Nov 8, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Tommy Kelly wrote: > >>> I haven't tried this myself, just looking at the manual. But playing >>> around, it seems you need double quotes around your tags match. >> >> Ah OK, that works. But it turns out there was a second problem and it >> may be a bug. It looks like any of the clocktable options after >> :indent get ignored. So this works: >> >> #+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 2 :scope file :block thisweek :step week >> :tags "test_tag" :indent >> #+END: >> >> But this doesn't (i.e. the :tags option is ignored) >> >> #+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 2 :scope file :block thisweek :step week >> :indent :tags "test_tag" > > You need > > :indent t > > This is a property list, each key needs a value. This makes sense. But why did his first example work, then? There is no `t' either. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban