From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastien Vauban" Subject: Re: Org/LaTeX set-up for business letters? Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 12:34:10 +0200 Message-ID: <804npiv8wt.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <8762a2l6f7.fsf@googlemail.com> <87mx3ejan4.fsf@googlemail.com> <87ipe1keow.fsf@googlemail.com> <20120707015505.GA10846@panahar> <87y5mvaild.fsf@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hi all, Thorsten Jolitz wrote: > Vikas Rawal writes: >>> > [1] Off the top of the head I recall a package called `scrlttr'. >>> >>> Yes, part of KOMA (?), but thats rather low level if you have to design >>> your own letters - and who knows all that stuff about professional letter >>> design?. I tried that once and the result was ugly, there is a lot of >>> extra work necesary to make it look fancy and modern. >> >> May be relevant to look at this thread from the list: >> >> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/29926 > > So package 'isodoc' seems to be another (maybe simpler?) option. However, > the thread proves again that it is not trivial to do-it-yourself. but there > are quite a lot of options, it seems. This is still the solution I'm using -- however, not often sending postal mails... The only drawback there is that we need to tangle the buffer, and C-c C-c the resulting LaTeX file in AUCTeX mode to get the PDF. IIRC, Eric planed to look at the problem so that we could stay in Org for making the whole loop. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban