From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastien Vauban" Subject: Re: Schedule event Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2011 20:59:53 +0200 Message-ID: <8039heicwm.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <877h6raiwc.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <807h6qk2jq.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hi Suvayu, suvayu ali wrote: > On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Sebastien Vauban > wrote: >>> Another idea would be to introduce another keyword like APPT an place >>> these time stamps also into the second line. That might be more easy to >>> implement. >> >> FWIW, my instinctive reaction would be: yes, great! =C2=A0Maybe that cla= rifies >> the bits around dates: all active dates get keywords, only inactive ones >> are without any keyword. > > Yes, this would be a nice addition. I always find it difficult to decide = how > to put regular timestamps too. By regular timestamps, you mean: inactive timestamps? Can you, maybe, comme= nt on what makes the decision difficult? Best regards, Seb --=20 Sebastien Vauban