emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Denis Maier <denis.maier.lists@mailbox.org>
To: Joost Kremers <joostkremers@fastmail.fm>,
	Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Question about citation processors [wip-cite branch]
Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 21:34:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7fe98a6a-8e35-e7bf-fb6e-b7acb341ec5b@mailbox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874kfih5ru.fsf@fastmail.fm>

Am 04.05.2021 um 17:27 schrieb Joost Kremers:
> On Tue, May 04 2021, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
>> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 10:47 AM Joost Kremers <joostkremers@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>>> I can add some comments regarding biblatex:
>>> - default: \parencite[1]
>> WDYT of \autocite for default?
>> It's conceptually the same as the CSL default.
> If that is the case then it's probably the better choice. The biblatex manual
> states that \autocite requires that the citation style defines a command for it
> and that it is not appropriate for author-year style citations. I assume that's
> something for the user to be aware of when using such citations?

Well, IIRC, in author-year styles \autocite is equivalent to \parencite. 
I think, what the manual talks about is not that \autocite wouldn't be 
appropriate for author-year styles, but rather that relying /solely/ on 
\autocite doesn't give authors the flexibility they might want in these 
styles, like when you want something like in your example:
According to \textcite[]{Jones1998} , ``students often had difficulty 
using APA
style, especially when it was their first time'' 

So, I think \autocite is the better choice.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-04 19:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-04 10:41 Joost Kremers
2021-05-04 13:45 ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-05-04 14:07   ` Joost Kremers
2021-05-04 15:04     ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-05-04 15:27       ` Joost Kremers
2021-05-04 19:34         ` Denis Maier [this message]
2021-05-04 20:04           ` Joost Kremers
2021-05-04 15:10     ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-05-04 15:22       ` Joost Kremers
2021-05-04 15:39         ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-05-04 16:22 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2021-05-04 19:17   ` Joost Kremers
2021-05-05 14:09     ` Nicolas Goaziou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7fe98a6a-8e35-e7bf-fb6e-b7acb341ec5b@mailbox.org \
    --to=denis.maier.lists@mailbox.org \
    --cc=bdarcus@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=joostkremers@fastmail.fm \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox


This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).