From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vladimir Panteleev Subject: Migrating to org-mode - question on lists Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 22:52:20 +0000 Message-ID: <7f4a9b79-4465-923f-be51-358cca2860f8@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57601) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8wwd-0002uh-Rq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 18:52:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8wwZ-0003o4-V4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 18:52:27 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-x242.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::242]:32976) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8wwZ-0003nY-OZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 18:52:23 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-x242.google.com with SMTP id y10so10089508wmh.0 for ; Thu, 11 May 2017 15:52:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from home.thecybershadow.net ([89.28.117.31]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v7sm1663166wrb.68.2017.05.11.15.52.21 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 May 2017 15:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: en-US List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello! A lot of thanks to all org-mode developers for their work. I've started using Emacs and org-mode last year, and have been steadily trying to migrate all of my notes from plain text to org-mode. I have run into some difficulties with porting over my project notes and to-do lists. For example, my to-do lists generally look something like this: - top-level task - something I haven't done yet + something I've already done - a minor improvement that I haven't done yet x something I decided isn't worth doing ? something that needs further clarification My software design notes look similar: - name of the component - one idea of how to implement it x an idea that turned out impractical/impossible/etc. - rationale + the idea I went with - rationale Real example (notes for a serialization library): https://dump.thecybershadow.net/ec9518b75f1001467972fb7deee058e9/notes.txt Although this mostly corresponds to using org-mode lists with checkboxes, the biggest obstacle I encountered is that there is no equivalent for the 'x' bullet. I've tried to simply mark off those items as checked checkboxes (and indicate the information some other way), however I've invariably found this as a regression in legibility. So, my questions are: - I've looked through the documentation (and source code, a bit), and though it doesn't seem like it, have I missed some org-mode functionality that would help this use case? - Would it make sense to teach org-mode to recognize another checkbox state (e.g. [!])? - Perhaps it's more practical to instead get org-mode to work with the syntax I already use. This would mean: 1. Being able to customize which characters org-mode considers as list bullets 2. Preserve each list item's individual bullet when reformatting lists 3. Optionally, allow recognizing certain list bullet characters as counting towards statistic cookies (as either completed or not). - Would the above changes be something I could perform myself with a reasonable amount of effort? And, would any of them make sense for inclusion into org-mode as additional options? (IMHO, a customizable alist for recognized list bullets and their effect or statistic cookies would be very nice!) Thanks for reading this far! -- Best regards, Vladimir