From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Frankel Subject: Re: Getting checkboxes in HTML output? Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:03:05 -0500 Message-ID: <7a3389b5515c311fea184a81b5da11a0@mail.rickster.com> References: "<20131127154534.GA12765@pdavismbp15.iscinternal.com> <8738mhal2d.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> <20131127182059.GB12765@pdavismbp15.iscinternal.com>" <20131128133329.GA28945@eyeBook> "<87vbzc9rmj.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <86haawtdya.fsf@somewhere.org> <16f7d77c0769177de44354bcf25abb37@mail.rickster.com> <87A2DB5F-009B-4C8E-8058-D9A5DA78748B@gmail.com> <20131130140703.GA45985@eyeBook>" <43B44636-263C-47D1-8853-55BFEFFCE576@gmail.com> <86k3fn1w2t.fsf@somewhere.org> <529CB77D.6050608@pfdstudio.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49137) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnrVK-0005cq-SB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:03:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnrVE-0004Yw-Q1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:03:14 -0500 Received: from mail.rickster.com ([204.62.15.78]:52337) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnrVE-0004YX-MS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:03:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <529CB77D.6050608@pfdstudio.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2013-12-02 11:38, Peter Davis wrote: > I've now changed ox-html.el to include this: > > (defun org-html-checkbox (checkbox) > "Format CHECKBOX into HTML." > (case checkbox (on "☒") > (off "☐") > (trans "☑") > (t ""))) > > > This is sort of close to using > [ ] for unchecked > [/] for partially checked > [X] for checked > > To my aging eyes, the check in U#9745 looks almost like a forward > slash. Certainly, though, this would be potentially confusing, > especially if no [X] boxes were present, so that only [ ] or [/] were > visible. Right. I am going to make this a configurable option in ox-html, although consensus is that trying to emulate the partial checkbox ([-]) w/ other unicode symbols is too confusing, so we will simply use an empty ballot box. rick