From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: [Accepted] Allow mixed export of numbered and unnumbered sections in HTML Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:57:03 -0400 Message-ID: <7791.1300892223@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <20110323140504.98CE6715E@myhost.localdomain> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53291 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q2PVE-0001mp-3f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:57:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2PVC-0006eR-PO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:57:39 -0400 Received: from vms173011pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.11]:53557) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2PVC-0006e9-LA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:57:38 -0400 Received: from alphaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173011.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LII0040MMV3OM00@vms173011.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:57:14 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: Message from Bastien Guerry of "Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:05:04 BST." <20110323140504.98CE6715E@myhost.localdomain> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Guerry Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien Guerry wrote: > Patch 711 (http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/711/) is now "Accepted". > > Maintainer comment: none > This is probably obvious but I thought I'd make it explicit, both for future wanderers and for further discussion: application of these patches makes the behavior of different exporters potentially inconsistent with each other. IMO, it would be better to accumulate the patches and once all of the exporters (or perhaps a critical mass: ascii, odt, docbook are the ones I would like to see get patches, but opinions will vary) have patches, then apply the whole thing in one commit (together with a documentation patch). In the meantime, if anybody needs one of them (hi, Suvayu :-)), they could carry it in their local branch. Of course, there is no perfect consistency in any case between the exporters, but I think at least making the effort to keep them consistent is better than letting them diverge and possibly never converge again. Comments? Nick