From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Problems with search Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 23:45:59 -0400 Message-ID: <7746.1310096759@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <87liw9ajv9.fsf@gmail.com> <6228.1310073400@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> <4824.1310091907@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41935) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qf21O-0007Eu-Dg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 23:46:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qf21N-0005kn-1k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 23:46:30 -0400 Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.3]:58735) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qf21M-0005jy-Pl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 23:46:28 -0400 Received: from alphaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173003.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LNZ00B7SX4OXDSC@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 22:46:07 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: Message from Henri-Paul Indiogine of "Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:14:25 PDT." List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Henri-Paul Indiogine Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-org Henri-Paul Indiogine wrote: > Hi Nick! > > 2011/7/7 Nick Dokos : > >> post-command-hook is a variable defined in `C source code'. > >> Its value is > >> (t autopair-post-command-handler) > >> > > > > This looks wrong: what's that t doing there? and where did it come from? > > I think it is from autopair.el > > (add-hook 'post-command-hook 'autopair-post-command-handler > 'append 'local)) > > I have had this autopair function for quite a while, well before the > search problem occurred. Also, if do not load autopair I still have > the search problem. > No, it's not the autopair-post-command-handler that I wondered about[fn:1], it's that *t*, the first element of the list: how did it get there? Nick Footnotes: [fn:1] Well, I did wonder about it, but only because I never heard of it; but I am more suspicious of that t.