From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dev] Implement "ref" link types
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 08:09:38 +0100
Message-ID: <763A8736-3DB8-492D-95CB-2E2D90982BAE@gmail.com>
References: <87vcn2vgq7.fsf@gmail.com>
	<E2A59F3A-458B-44D7-B794-C2429FD18F9D@gmail.com>
	<8739a62upy.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59907)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1RzNNb-0001Ol-5K
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 02:09:50 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1RzNNV-0002lP-El
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 02:09:47 -0500
Received: from pony.ic.uva.nl ([145.18.40.181]:36693)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1RzNNV-0002lI-4i
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 02:09:41 -0500
In-Reply-To: <8739a62upy.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>


On Feb 20, 2012, at 1:51 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> Why are you saying it is not a full replacement for \ref{something}?
> 
> There are still a few limitations. For example, you cannot reference
> a precise list item since items do not accept affiliated keywords.

Ah, yes, this is right.

Regards

- Carsten

> 
>> It is better than that because it will work in more backends....
> 
> Yes, this is a big advantage.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -- 
> Nicolas Goaziou

- Carsten