From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Co-maintainer, a least for some time?
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 17:34:35 -0400
Message-ID: <71895577-6263-4AF3-B4FC-D02F51C7A504@gmail.com>
References: <4bf55eb1.216ae50a.74d1.0bfeSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com>
	<4BF576C1.2000102@googlemail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47047 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFDO8-0004RX-EZ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 17:34:45 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <jwiegley@gmail.com>) id 1OFDO6-0007dp-9a
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 17:34:44 -0400
Received: from mail-pv0-f169.google.com ([74.125.83.169]:43895)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <jwiegley@gmail.com>) id 1OFDO5-0007dV-Pf
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 17:34:42 -0400
Received: by pvh11 with SMTP id 11so261915pvh.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 20 May 2010 14:34:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4BF576C1.2000102@googlemail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Thomas Renkert <thomas.renkert@googlemail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On May 20, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Thomas Renkert wrote:

> What about using launchpad.net for bugtracking?

GitHub also has simple issue tracking, with the advantage that it can =
bind very closely with Git commits.

John=