Re: [RFC] Quoting property names in tag/property matches [Was: [BUG?] Matching tags: & operator no more implicit between tags and special property]

[Jens Schmidt <jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de>]

On 2023-08-26  12:16, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Jens Schmidt <jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de> writes:
>>  #+begin_example
>> -+-long-and-twisted-property-name-="foo"
>> +\-long\=and\\twisted\:property\.name\*="foo"
>>  #+end_example
> 
> This actually feels rather cubersome.

That particular example looks awkward, but pls don't forget that
users (mostly) have been happy without any option of quoting so
far.  IOW, there shouldn't be much to quote in real life.  I can
provide a simpler example in the manual, but that's probably not
what you meant :-)

> I am now wondering if we could instead do something like
> "-long=and\twisted:property.name*"="foo"
> Then, we will just have to quote the " itself, not all
> non-alphanumerics.
> 
> Although, using " might be tricky.

Agreed.  It introduces more context, and longer context, than a
simple backslash.  Plus double quotes are already used for other
purposes in the larger regexp, which could introduce more
ambiguities.

Finally, a term

  "foo-bar"="foo-bar"

looks, er, tautologically? at best.