From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: No dot in datepicker dialog
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:40:05 +0200
Message-ID: <6C31F019-773E-4F81-8004-EB98014C0DE6@gmail.com>
References: <2013-03-26T20-43-10@devnull.Karl-Voit.at>
	<87hajm1mpa.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20130404141946.GE16563@boo.workgroup>
	<CALn3zohFzW=-oOFwCzDeJf1roq5xGzCoHua+pcyePYN55XL=Sg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87zjwo2w0a.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<846C2072-E035-4403-BD96-FDC72999FC61@gmail.com>
	<87ppxke3cy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<A5B19D00-852B-443E-ACAB-E4737D9B0284@gmail.com>
	<87wqrsclpr.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57766)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1UUwBU-0005kt-A2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 05:40:17 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1UUwBS-0002wa-8c
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 05:40:16 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87wqrsclpr.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>, Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>


On 24.4.2013, at 11:38, Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> wrote:

> Hi Carsten,
> 
> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> I think only doing this at the beginning of the prompt is better,
>> anywhere else it is too magic.  
> 
> Okay, I implemented this by checking if we are at the start of the
> prompt with `looking-back'.  Using "prompt" here would raise a
> compiler warning -- we would need to use org-prompt instead of prompt
> and to (defvar org-prompt) ... a bit too much IMO.


Yes, this is better.

> 
>> Maybe we can have a command like C-c . which will work everywhere?
> 
> I've done this too.

Thank you.

- Carsten

> 
> -- 
> Bastien