From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Symmetric encryption with org-crypt.el? Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 18:59:43 +0200 Message-ID: <6AAEB8CF-809F-4079-8D97-CC94A572E9FF@uva.nl> References: <48E9DDB9.8020500@calicojack.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kmv1a-00008D-MY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:41:42 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kmv1Z-00007x-TC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:41:42 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55851 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kmv1Z-00007u-Mi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:41:41 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.184]:40455) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kmv1Z-0006mX-9i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:41:41 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c7so1162622nfi.26 for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:41:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <48E9DDB9.8020500@calicojack.co.uk> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rick Moynihan Cc: emacs-orgmode On Oct 6, 2008, at 11:43 AM, Rick Moynihan wrote: > Is it possible to use a symmetric cipher with org-crypt.el? I'd > really like to encrypt certain outlines and encode/decode them on > several machines without worrying about managing public/private keys. > > I can see how using public key crypto might be benefecial when > sharing files between several parties, but for the case where a > single user simply wants to synchronise org files between various > machines (and never store/transmit sensitive data unencrypted) then > a symmetric cipher seems preferable due to its lower overhead. > > Has anyone done this? Not that I know o, but I think, starting with org-crypt this should be relatively straight forward. There must be someone else around here who can take on this task, right? - Carsten