From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: unicorn image is not a link back to the front page on orgmode.org Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:27:43 +0200 Message-ID: <6AAB5C90-C0F1-4395-BF2A-63358434A40B@gmail.com> References: <487323a00906240639w1e4789ebjca5689decd03e795@mail.gmail.com> <87bpodirx8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87y6rhh72x.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <71454fac0906241117r337a565ey6cde3f6269c55094@mail.gmail.com> <87tz25h227.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <877hz1bfe0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87bpoch3fi.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87skhol75c.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MJpvf-0007yd-1K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:27:55 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MJpva-0007mt-5i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:27:54 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37072 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MJpvZ-0007mc-UO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:27:49 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f220.google.com ([209.85.219.220]:62053) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MJpvZ-00079K-IH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:27:49 -0400 Received: by ewy20 with SMTP id 20so171575ewy.42 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 07:27:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87skhol75c.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastian Rose Cc: Bastien , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, James Yoo On Jun 25, 2009, at 4:28 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote: > Bastien writes: >> Carsten Dominik writes: >> >>> What would be wrong with pulling the image out of the >>> background and making it directly clickable? >> >> None, I've done this. Great. I am also more comfortable with this because invisible clicking areas are notoriously used by fishing sites to make users believe they click one thing, and in fact they click another. At least this is how I interpret what I hear. Lets try to keep things transparent..... - Carsten > > :-D > > good idea.. :) > > I'll re-check the IE stuff tonight. > > > > Sebastian >