From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Journal versus clock tables: Opposing requirements?
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 11:15:08 +0100
Message-ID: <6A5DE61E-F7F8-4022-9F3E-54DDD3300F60@gmail.com>
References: <CAMg28Otfnhz5_mZXmg0B6aZ5vZs04n6tvwWW+ftRSzwtL2ucxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87obwogo1c.fsf@rat.lan>
	<CAMg28Ot=Ti+6-gSFj6qT48d4ZT=E3shXDiD-BCavnZv4jf8X8w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMg28Ov2ktTbtOuaqcgboGwGrNkePyF++_hvdcwV9K-jpaPNqg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87bosngf3t.fsf@rat.lan>
	<CAMg28OsvMtSYH8n2Yqikxwvf+P5N=o2BjqyMotp0p4AJk+aKkA@mail.gmail.com>
	<B41CCCF9-8821-4A0C-8483-2FF71652B4FF@gmail.com>
	<8062ivlyj8.fsf@somewhere.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39729)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1RNii9-0000DL-TR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 05:15:22 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1RNii0-0005Xo-J4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 05:15:21 -0500
Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:57748)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1RNii0-0005Xi-BE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 05:15:12 -0500
Received: by eye4 with SMTP id 4so201024eye.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 02:15:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8062ivlyj8.fsf@somewhere.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


On Nov 8, 2011, at 11:05 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote:

> Hi Carsten,
>=20
> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> On Nov 8, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Tommy Kelly wrote:
>>=20
>>>> I haven't tried this myself, just looking at the manual. But =
playing
>>>> around, it seems you need double quotes around your tags match.
>>>=20
>>> Ah OK, that works. But it turns out there was a second problem and =
it
>>> may be a bug. It looks like any of the clocktable options after
>>> :indent get ignored. So this works:
>>>=20
>>> #+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 2 :scope file :block thisweek :step =
week
>>> :tags "test_tag" :indent
>>> #+END:
>>>=20
>>> But this doesn't (i.e. the :tags option is ignored)
>>>=20
>>> #+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 2 :scope file :block thisweek :step =
week
>>> :indent :tags "test_tag"
>>=20
>> You need
>>=20
>>   :indent t
>>=20
>> This is a property list, each key needs a value.
>=20
> This makes sense. But why did his first example work, then?  There is =
no `t'
> either.

Probably, :indent was perceived by the code as nil, but at least
it did not swallow the :tags key.....

- Carsten=