From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean-Christophe Helary Subject: Re: org 9.2.6 and org 9.1.9 Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 08:14:20 +0900 Message-ID: <68782497-408D-4E97-8CA0-72B41882FB13@traduction-libre.org> References: <7D2A3D8D-CB71-4B0D-8839-9633BD9F9C4B@traduction-libre.org> <874kyqcuup.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3601.0.10\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <874kyqcuup.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-devel" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Emacs developers List-Id: emacs-orgmode.gnu.org Nick, thank you for your reply. > On Nov 27, 2019, at 4:15, Nick Dokos wrote: >=20 > Jean-Christophe Helary = writes: >=20 >> org 9.1.9 is a built-in >>=20 >> but org 9.2.6 comes as a dependency to some packages and having both = installed creates conflicts. >>=20 >=20 > What conflicts are you seeing? At one point I was unable to archive subtrees because some function was = undefined. I uninstalled 9.2.6 and the issues was fixed. > I have the built-in 9.1.9 org that > comes with emacs but I run (close to) latest master and I see no > problems: Obviously you are not the typical user... :) What should happen is that 1) packages.el should see that I'm trying to install a package that = requires 9.2.6 as a dependency and it should notify me that 9.1.9 is = already installed and do I really want to do that, etc. 2) *or* just consider that it's better for me to use 9.2.6 instead of = whatever comes with emacs and make sure that the older package is = forgotten by emacs. But honestly, I think 1) should be the default for any package. Jean-Christophe Helary ----------------------------------------------- http://mac4translators.blogspot.com @brandelune