Re: Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week

[Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>]

Memnon Anon <gegendosenfleisch@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> writes:
> 
> > But I saw a message implying that Debian does not consider emacs
> > documentation free (!?!?), so the info files may be in
> > emacs23-common-non-dfsg in this case.
> 
> The FSF isn't the only one caring about "Freedom".
> Where more than one entity exists, they are bound to disagree sometimes :).
> 
> 
> ,----[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DFSG#GFDL ]
> | Much documentation written by the GNU Project, the Linux Documentation
> | Project and others licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License
> | contain invariant sections, which do not comply with the DFSG. This
> | assertion is the end result of a long discussion and the General
> | Resolution 2006-001.[11]
> | 
> | Due to the GFDL invariant sections, content under this license must be
> | separately contained in an additional "non-free" repository which is not
> | officially considered part of Debian.
> `----
> 

Yup - as I indicated, I found it somewhat surprising, so I found and
read the resolution.  I think it's all pretty small nits, but thank
goodness IANAL (haven't even played one on TV): the havoc that I could
wreak would be unimaginable...

Nick