From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Nagarjuna G." <nagarjun@gnowledge.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Is there a good way to use org as blog system?
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:46:48 +0530
Message-ID: <62b3fb50910012216o4b4ab95eia2a66279c4dbb609@mail.gmail.com>
References: <83eipo4wd0.fsf@ymail.com>
	<874oqkh6cj.fsf@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com>
	<62b3fb50909301817w1bfdee96u128bf14c7fe553b2@mail.gmail.com>
	<m2hbujevnp.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MtaVu-0003Av-IO
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:17:06 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MtaVp-00033q-3J
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:17:05 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56961 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MtaVo-00033b-Tb
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:17:00 -0400
Received: from gnowledge.org ([158.144.44.247]:49256)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <nagarjun@gnowledge.org>) id 1MtaVo-0006X0-Ah
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:17:00 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by gnowledge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD34BD41F
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri,  2 Oct 2009 10:48:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from gnowledge.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (gnowledge.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id APv3GLkzqnBK for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>;
	Fri,  2 Oct 2009 10:48:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-px0-f202.google.com (mail-px0-f202.google.com
	[209.85.216.202])
	by gnowledge.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB062BD40B
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri,  2 Oct 2009 10:48:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pxi40 with SMTP id 40so917353pxi.24
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m2hbujevnp.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com> wrote=
:
> I started down this path some months ago and generated the following as
> a sort of tentative exploration
>
> http://github.com/eschulte/simple-server
>
> which makes use of
>
> http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/EmacsEchoServer
>
> and httpd.el at http://emarsden.chez.com/downloads/
>
> It is certainly possible to go further...
>

Thanks Eric.  We will try to use them and get back to you.

> it is currently possible to hand single elisp statements to Emacs in
> batch mode, however startup time (starting Emacs, loading all elisp
> files, and implementing any .emacs customization) is an issue. =A0To the
> best of my knowledge there is nothing like an elisp REPL currently
> implemented, although it would be possible and there has been scattered
> discussion on this topic
>

yes, using batchmode will have high latency.  I will give a serious
attempt to further this line of work.  It is useful for us.

--=20
Nagarjuna G.
http://www.gnowledge.org/