From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Gauland Subject: Re: [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. " References: <87wowoh1m9.fsf@aquinas.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------D784C97565EFBB17FC61C39C" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42116) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fDGQf-0004HM-F8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:33:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fDGQb-00019l-Et for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:33:49 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22d]:39634) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fDGQb-00018J-8e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:33:45 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id b9-v6so7136902pgf.6 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 14:33:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [132.181.71.164] ([132.181.71.164]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g68sm16486566pfk.53.2018.04.30.14.33.41 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Apr 2018 14:33:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------D784C97565EFBB17FC61C39C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Same here! On 01/05/18 08:46, Peter Dewey Ore wrote: > I second (third?) Richard and Jon. I use appreciate the simplicity. > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Richard Lawrence > > > wrote: > > Jon Snader > writes: > > I use the it enabled. I don't want to have to deal with a menu and its > more complicated calling sequence > > > I feel the same!  Please don't disable complicated to use. > > -- > Best, > Richard > > --------------D784C97565EFBB17FC61C39C Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Same here!


On 01/05/18 08:46, Peter Dewey Ore wrote:
I second (third?) Richard and Jon. I use <s[TAB] very frequently and I appreciate the simplicity.

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Richard Lawrence <richard.lawrence@berkeley.edu> wrote:
Jon Snader <jcs@irreal.org> writes:

I use the <s[TAB] mechanism all the time and /definitely/ want it enabled. I don't want to have to deal with a menu and its more complicated calling sequence

 I feel the same!  Please don't disable <s[TAB] or make it more complicated to use.

--
Best,
Richard



--------------D784C97565EFBB17FC61C39C--