From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Leyon Subject: Re: Re: POLL: Change of keys to move agenda through time Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:20:53 -0400 Message-ID: <5ea706d0908250520u62ca057cq138201f1397b2c4b@mail.gmail.com> References: <87skfgxn0f.fsf@gmail.com> <87vdkduo9s.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ocq4xgxd.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mfv1H-0004yw-Qz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:20:59 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mfv1D-0004vk-4B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:20:59 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48823 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mfv1D-0004vg-0R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:20:55 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f206.google.com ([209.85.217.206]:51589) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mfv1C-000792-Ml for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:20:54 -0400 Received: by gxk2 with SMTP id 2so3885347gxk.7 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:20:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs org-mode mailing list Another solution would be to use "f" and "b" to move forward and backward in time. Some other Agenda bindings would have to change to accommodate this. Old "f" (org-agenda-follow-mode) could become "F" which is unused. But "b" and "B" are both used and would need to be remapped. Obviously this is not the easiest possible solution. However, these bindings would be very consistent with the conventions of most other Emacs packages. The agenda mode bindings are getting very crowded with many functions and free keys are running out. It may be time to start creating prefix-keys/dispatchers a la Dired and Gnus. On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 07:48, Carsten Dominik wrote: > I tend to agree with the arguments that "n" and "p" should move > vertically in the agenda buffer, because many Emacs modes do > it like this. > > So it seem to me that this discussion should focus on which keys should > move the agenda forward and backward in time.