From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= Subject: Re: Make wide tables more readable Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:33:30 -0500 Message-ID: <5ad9b4eb-ed2f-274e-213a-ffb7c91b97cc@gmail.com> References: <87polbqt2i.fsf@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nfc6XQCKm9puftbPpTAGbaLUTmQfnr4Wk" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46817) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCYz9-0007sU-6o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 16:33:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCYz6-0007yT-1B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 16:33:43 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:53296) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCYz5-0007xw-Oq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 16:33:39 -0500 Received: from [18.26.2.123] ([18.26.2.123]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue101 [212.227.15.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MQ6Al-1cHldy2TuV-005EXv for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 22:33:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --nfc6XQCKm9puftbPpTAGbaLUTmQfnr4Wk Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="UPsgCWSSIhsdKFggeRXu7SlqHG0I7K7vB"; protected-headers="v1" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Message-ID: <5ad9b4eb-ed2f-274e-213a-ffb7c91b97cc@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [O] Make wide tables more readable References: <87polbqt2i.fsf@fastmail.fm> In-Reply-To: --UPsgCWSSIhsdKFggeRXu7SlqHG0I7K7vB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Joost Kremers wrote: > Why not use `text-scale-adjust`?=20 On 2016-12-01 16:12, John Kitchin wrote: > If I had to guess its because I was unaware of that command when I wrot= e those functions ;) Note that these two don't do the same thing. Text-scale-adjust changes t= he face-remapping-alist, which breaks things like company-mode. On the o= ther hand, text-scale-adjust is very fast, while John's solution (which w= orks fine with company-mode) is rather slow. Additionally, John's solution applies to the current frame, whereas text-= scale-adjust is usually restricted to a single buffer. Cl=C3=A9ment. --UPsgCWSSIhsdKFggeRXu7SlqHG0I7K7vB-- --nfc6XQCKm9puftbPpTAGbaLUTmQfnr4Wk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYQJcqAAoJEPqg+cTm90wjMgcQAJpQ7y5z1rvXwWbYvacp0SzY XKgB4wz9C7ZrZm1qQ+gAUiQrUL+zlaIeJIhKvOgslxXsQtYE4GfSPERpCIloVy3Q 75SUp9uEQl8CZMgpdO7a0EnRs6nh570RZnjW6RlUaYx3+oRPROGLTA5l/1elLEuX EiwlHmgEc9duyvbUo45pqJDToAaU0rpLIpRzOdIGNaSFlXo+qiBnH7muTxM7R62i 4US1ncn1tLhHu4FbqXyzIVfe/9Ux8Mglm78+Lg4f7r0LYvtpyRKVSyKw03o+B4pb 5mMYo17Kji2RSw/RHZFm53lblqoDKKizlsQeQQTwCnE0GYR1+l88Jloq2aao3byH xvsNa4l1viqPKelKZEbE8x3mdWldq8TgAfiOJR6eBr8+uVAXPHFy+VXCOJfHtDcD 8lHlxPIy+1RwPJf/jZGNXQOpN/TjMYikGgVfN0hXWmZTWALRO4YHCVzd6D97SeR9 PX5Lw4lNNuMWHw61+Sw/UeoNA19io1Pb7Bj/LRSUDmWgoGuDbjHYC76E4AL/S1YY t+kSo6LHDlQ/MnewYBNN/4ECUh9y6vwZ1x63CliW6LPcd6bNzLpGnwx7hB32DwIG sVV3ax2+5IM5mIQDgXzfDTXHTMM9l5gfpxXCjOyUT9wNbePmU1DlDZ29F6v+fRSu Os44dt8Js230Uwroki0f =kZx6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nfc6XQCKm9puftbPpTAGbaLUTmQfnr4Wk--