emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
To: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: org-mode on sloooow computer
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:26:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A8DAF72-27D1-4BC5-B70C-884E2F98620B@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87hc0fe35v.fsf@eeepc.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk>

8-10 seconds, that is a lot.

On Apr 23, 2009, at 6:38 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've been using org-mode more and more and, unsurprisingly, it gets
> slower and slower due to the increasing amount of data org-mode has to
> parse and evaluate.  On my desktop systems (and on my full-featured
> laptop), this is not yet a problem [1].  On my little netbook (the
> original eee pc from Asus which is used primarily for org-mode!),  
> there
> are some annoyances due to the much slower cpu.  I'd like to mention  
> one
> that I believe should be easy to fix (for those with much more elisp
> expertise than my own...):
>
> When in agenda view, when org-agenda-goto-date is invoked (typically
> with 'j'), the agenda view is regenerated for today's date  
> regardless of
> which date I am currently viewing, before allowing me to input a date.

I don't think I can reproduce this.

> This seems an unnecessary step and I wonder whether it would be easy  
> to
> change?  On my Asus, regenerating the view for my current date (with
> todos, scheduled items, etc) takes at least 8 seconds!  When I'm
> checking out various dates in the future for possible meetings or
> whatever, having to wait up to 10 seconds each time I look at a
> different date gets a little frustrating.
>
> I've had a look at org-agenda-goto-date and org-read-date but it's not
> immediately apparent to me why the current date's view has to be
> generated.

- Carsten

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-23 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-23 16:38 org-mode on sloooow computer Eric S Fraga
2009-04-23 19:15 ` Sven Bretfeld
2009-04-23 20:30   ` Carsten Dominik
2009-04-24  9:22     ` Eric S Fraga
2009-04-24  9:42       ` Carsten Dominik
2009-04-24  9:51         ` Eric S Fraga, Eric S Fraga
2009-04-24 10:25         ` Eric S Fraga
2009-04-24 11:35           ` Carsten Dominik
2009-04-24 12:51             ` Matthew Lundin
2009-04-24 15:27             ` Leo
2009-04-24 15:57               ` Nick Dokos
2009-04-24 16:22                 ` Leo
2009-04-25  4:06     ` Samuel Wales
2009-04-23 20:26 ` Carsten Dominik [this message]
2009-04-23 22:10   ` Eric S Fraga, Eric S Fraga
2009-04-24  5:03     ` Carsten Dominik
2009-04-24  8:24       ` Eric S Fraga, Eric S Fraga
2009-04-24  9:01         ` Carsten Dominik
2009-04-24 13:37           ` Rainer Stengele
2009-04-24 13:49             ` Carsten Dominik
2009-04-24 15:47               ` Eric S Fraga, Eric S Fraga
2009-04-24 18:25                 ` Carsten Dominik
2009-04-24 22:26                   ` Eric S Fraga, Eric S Fraga
2009-04-25  3:51                     ` Carsten Dominik
2009-04-25  8:19                       ` Eric S Fraga, Eric S Fraga
2009-04-25 16:25                         ` Bernt Hansen
2009-04-30 14:13                           ` Carsten Dominik
2009-04-24 14:47             ` Carsten Dominik
2009-04-28 10:33               ` Rainer Stengele
2009-04-30 14:14                 ` Carsten Dominik
2009-08-31 17:49                   ` Daniel Martins
2009-08-31 18:02                     ` Leo
2009-08-31 18:12                       ` Daniel Martins
2009-08-31 18:41                         ` Matt Lundin
2009-08-31 21:03                           ` Daniel Martins
2009-08-31 21:11                             ` Leo
2009-08-31 21:25                               ` Daniel Martins
2009-09-01  4:20                                 ` Carsten Dominik
2009-09-01 13:15                                   ` Daniel Martins
2009-09-02  7:15                                     ` Carsten Dominik
2009-08-31 18:14                     ` Matt Lundin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5A8DAF72-27D1-4BC5-B70C-884E2F98620B@gmail.com \
    --to=carsten.dominik@gmail.com \
    --cc=e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).