From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thierry Banel Subject: Re: speeding up Babel Gnuplot Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 19:24:45 +0100 Message-ID: <586FE0ED.5090402@free.fr> References: <5864217C.7060001@free.fr> <586963CB.1000006@free.fr> <87d1g6qrqh.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <586AB3DB.6070702@free.fr> <586C1A53.90601@free.fr> <87wpebbygr.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <586C2E80.4050805@free.fr> <87d1g2sba9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <586EB0F0.7070400@free.fr> <87h95c1q55.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55957) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cPZC6-0001ET-Q4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:24:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cPZC6-0001sW-4g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:24:50 -0500 Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr ([2a01:e0c:1:1599::12]:16749) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cPZC5-0001qA-TH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:24:50 -0500 Received: from [IPv6:2a01:e35:2e21:def0:6d84:fa8b:21b6:7ab7] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e35:2e21:def0:6d84:fa8b:21b6:7ab7]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3854413F903 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 19:24:46 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87h95c1q55.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Le 06/01/2017 10:41, Nicolas Goaziou a =E9crit : > Hello, > > Thierry Banel writes: > >> By "going through the table" I mean going through this structure. >> Remember the issue in the first place was a slow conversion of this >> huge structure into a temporary file. Now we need to convert this huge >> structure into a hash. Ok, let us assume hashing is faster than >> writing to disk. > Converting this huge structure into a temporary file is (relatively) > slow because of `orgtbl-to-generic', isn't it? Computing the hash > doesn't call this function. > > Why do you expect computing the hash to be slow? > > I don't. I "assume hashing is faster than writing to disk." Regards Thierry