Re: pandoc-style citations

[Alex Fenton <alex.fenton@pressure.to>]

On 27/04/16 21:41, John Kitchin wrote:
> you might also checkout helm-bibtex. A recent note indicated "Support
> for pre- and postnotes for pandoc-citeproc citations."

Thanks, I already use helm-bibtex together with org-ref so will have a look.
> this exports out of the org-ref box to:
> blah blah blah \cite[][, p.23]{ref1}, also \cite{ref2}, for a contrary
> view see \cite[][ pp148-152]{ref3}.
>
> I don't use this style of citations, so I don't know if it is right.

Not quite unfortunately, this would mean that in the two styles I use, 
Harvard (common in social science) referencing, the references appear in 
separate parentheses, or footnote (common in e.g. history) in separate 
footnotes, when they should be together in a single one. I appreciate 
that the style in medicine and many natural sciences is often just an 
author/year abbreviation or number, which works much better plopped into 
normal running text.

best
alex