From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Subject: Re: change call-process also for GNU emacs? (was: Solved)
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:42:08 -0500
Message-ID: <5633.1327858928@alphaville>
References: <87sjizvasf.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87bopnmtll.fsf@mat.ucm.es>
	<878vkrxxsb.fsf@gnu.org> <3749.1327796037@alphaville>
	<87ehuizhcp.fsf_-_@mat.ucm.es>
Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39156)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1RrYlb-0004XR-9D
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:42:16 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1RrYlZ-0005lg-TW
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:42:15 -0500
Received: from g1t0029.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.36]:40988)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1RrYlZ-0005lU-NE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:42:13 -0500
In-Reply-To: Message from Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es>
	of "Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:57:42 +0100." <87ehuizhcp.fsf_-_@mat.ucm.es>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es>
Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, xemacs-beta@xemacs.org

Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es> wrote:

> >> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:13:57 -0500, Nick Dokos
> >> <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> wrote: 
> 
>    >> 
> 
>    > ... and bonus points if you also fix the problems described in
> 
> Now I am confused, from the link, you provided, I conclude
> you are talking about GNU Emacs, however I only wanted my changes to
> work with Xemacs and therefore wrap a
> 
> (if (featurep 'xemacs)
> 
> Around my changes. If you want to have the changes I have in
> mind for call-process also for GNU Emacs, I think the
> maintainers should have a say.
> 

Actually, it might very well be that they are Xemacs problems as well,
but you are right: I meant that since you'd be visiting the area, I
might convince you to do some additional work and fix those bugs as
well.

Nick