From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: [RFC] Move ox-koma-letter into core? Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 19:10:25 +0100 Message-ID: <55F46D73-2430-4831-ABE9-D66AE03647E7@gmail.com> References: <878uueciku.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38578) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4aMq-0005K8-KH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 13:11:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4aMK-0001lO-JX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 13:11:36 -0500 Received: from mail-ea0-f179.google.com ([209.85.215.179]:52385) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4aMK-0001ij-DW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 13:11:04 -0500 Received: by mail-ea0-f179.google.com with SMTP id q10so1482662ead.10 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:10:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <878uueciku.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Alan Schmitt , Org Mode List On 18 Jan 2014, at 00:08, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > "ox-koma-letter" is an export back-end living in contrib, which, as you > may know, allows to easily produce letters from Org. I think this is > a nice feature to have[fn:1]. Should we have it in core? I like the koma-letter class and have no objections to move it onto core. > > There is one thing to consider, though: Viktor Rosenfeld (Cc'ed) > contributed a significant number of lines of code to the file but hasn't > signed FSF papers, AFAIK. Viktor, what is your positions on this? - Carsten > > WDYT? > > > Regards, > > [fn:1] Luis Anaya's ox-groff.el seems to provide similar features but > I haven't tested it. Though, AFAICS, Groff is more limited than LaTeX. > > -- > Nicolas Goaziou >