From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vaidheeswaran Subject: Re: Citation syntax and ODT Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:40:42 +0530 Message-ID: <54EAD272.7040007@gmail.com> References: <87zj85s1vf.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54EAC71A.6080502@gmail.com> Reply-To: vaidheeswaran.chinnaraju@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58613) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YPn8B-000148-CD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 02:08:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YPn87-0002Dy-Bv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 02:08:39 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::230]:42818) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YPn87-0002Ds-3F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 02:08:35 -0500 Received: by pdbfp1 with SMTP id fp1so23332389pdb.9 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 23:08:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54EAC71A.6080502@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: vaidheeswaran.chinnaraju@gmail.com Cc: Richard Lawrence , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Vaidheeswaran > More importantly I see Nicolas willing to make the > necessary modifications to export engine. Let us JUST ACCEPT what Nicolas is saying and work from there. Otherwise, the current momentum will peter out (much like earlier initiatives). For now, if each of us could just step back a little and focus on getting just the nose inside the tent, it will be not long before the camel is inside the tent. If we are trying to get the whole camel head-body-and-tail, it is going to be a non-starter. I am seeing that Nicolas has strong ideas on how the syntax should look. He is dithering only because he wants someone to step forward and puncture his ideas. Instead of making fresh proposals, it would be efficacious if each of us could: 1. Orient ourselves in to puncturing the seat that Nicolas is sitting on. 2. Focus on the bare minimal functionality agreeable -- agreeable but MAY NOT be satisfactory -- to whole spectrum of users right from a kindergarterner to a post-doctoral fellow. Meanwhile, I am opened up a fresh channel with Nicolas as a self-appointed representative of ODT users...