From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Egli Christian \(KIRO 43\)" <christian.egli@credit-suisse.com>
Subject: RE: Re: A nice feature to suggest
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:57:18 +0100
Message-ID: <52D89C75FEE9444E8D9C016E3730098306CD8D@chsa1036.share.beluni.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HLbfz-0007Sg-Qb
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:57:43 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HLbfz-0007SN-2T
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:57:43 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLbfy-0007SI-Q9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:57:42 -0500
Received: from mail-gw12.credit-suisse.com ([198.240.213.21])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.52) id 1HLbfy-0001A1-4E
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:57:42 -0500
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi all

> Maybe not directly related, but still: what about my past suggestion
> of a static (unfoldable) but active headline? =20

> The syntax i suggested for it was like:

>  **: a headline

> It would be convenient when you need to store inline tasks that are
> neither proper headlines nor list items.  Such a headline wouldn't
> (un)fold, not because its content must stay invisible, but because it
> has no content.

What is the use case for this?

> Does that make sense ?

Not to me. What is this for? Makes it complicated to explain (on the
mailing list and in the manual. "Why does my node not fold"). Makes the
code complex.

Christian