From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Davis Subject: Re: Getting checkboxes in HTML output? Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:38:21 -0500 Message-ID: <529CB77D.6050608@pfdstudio.com> References: <20131127154534.GA12765@pdavismbp15.iscinternal.com> <8738mhal2d.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> <20131127182059.GB12765@pdavismbp15.iscinternal.com> <20131128133329.GA28945@eyeBook> <87vbzc9rmj.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <86haawtdya.fsf@somewhere.org> <16f7d77c0769177de44354bcf25abb37@mail.rickster.com> <87A2DB5F-009B-4C8E-8058-D9A5DA78748B@gmail.com> <20131130140703.GA45985@eyeBook> <43B44636-263C-47D1-8853-55BFEFFCE576@gmail.com> <86k3fn1w2t.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39480) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnWcY-0006nO-88 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:45:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnWcS-0003Zb-OW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:45:18 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:40454) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnWcS-0003ZE-CQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:45:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <86k3fn1w2t.fsf@somewhere.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org I've now changed ox-html.el to include this: (defun org-html-checkbox (checkbox) "Format CHECKBOX into HTML." (case checkbox (on "☒") (off "☐") (trans "☑") (t ""))) This is sort of close to using [ ] for unchecked [/] for partially checked [X] for checked To my aging eyes, the check in U#9745 looks almost like a forward slash. Certainly, though, this would be potentially confusing, especially if no [X] boxes were present, so that only [ ] or [/] were visible. -pd -- Peter Davis The Tech Curmudgeon www.techcurmudgeon.com