From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan L Tyree Subject: Re: org-grep, and problems Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:17:42 +1100 Message-ID: <525C6D86.4090107@gmail.com> References: <864n8pw2eg.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <228E2892-5CCF-4310-A503-31907B7B8504@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000806020603090504090109" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37100) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VVqRu-000474-Ex for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:17:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VVqRq-0000ru-4x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:17:14 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22d]:51006) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VVqRp-0000ra-Pw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:17:10 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id mc17so7904907pbc.18 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:17:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000806020603090504090109 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 15/10/13 05:19, Jonathan Leech-Pepin wrote: > > Hello, > > On Oct 14, 2013 10:43 AM, "James Harkins" > wrote: > > > > R. Michael Weylandt gmail.com > > > > gmail.com > writes: > > > > > On Oct 10, 2013, at 11:50, François Pinard > iro.umontreal.ca > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. What is proper English: "nobody remember" or "nobody > remembers"? > > > > > > > > > > Remembers. 'Nobody' counts as singular, as does 'no one'. English > isn't > > totally consistent on this > > > matter, however, as 'none' takes a plural verb. > > > > > > No one is brave enough to skip the meeting, even though none of > the bosses > > are going to attend. > > > > Actually, I think the latter clause is incorrect usage. The verb's > subject is > > "none," not "bosses"; since the subject is singular, the verb form > should be > > singular as well. It "feels wrong" to have a singular verb > immediately after a > > plural noun, but that noun properly belongs to the preposition, not > the verb. > > > > I'm voting for "none of the bosses is going to attend." > > None is a bit of an odd case, since it reflects the plurality of the > associated noun. > > None of the group is going... > None of the groups are going... > None of the bosses are going to attend. > > Some, most, all also follow that pattern: > All of the group is... > All of the bosses are... > > Group allows for both the plural and similar case since even one group > still has multiple members (at least it implies such). > > Jon > > > hjh > > > > > Strunk & White 3rd edition p9: With none, use the singular verb when the word means "no one" or "not one." None of us are perfect. None of us is perfect. A plural verb is commonly used when none suggests more than one thing or person. None are so fallible as those who are sure they're right. Alan -- Alan L Tyree http://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan Tel: 04 2748 6206 sip:typhoon@iptel.org --------------000806020603090504090109 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On 15/10/13 05:19, Jonathan Leech-Pepin wrote:

Hello,

On Oct 14, 2013 10:43 AM, "James Harkins" <jamshark70@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> R. Michael Weylandt <michael.weylandt <at> gmail.com> <michael.weylandt <at>
> gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Oct 10, 2013, at 11:50, François Pinard <pinard <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > P.S. What is proper English: "nobody remember" or "nobody remembers"?
> > >
> >
> > Remembers. 'Nobody' counts as singular, as does 'no one'. English isn't
> totally consistent on this
> > matter, however, as 'none' takes a plural verb.
> >
> > No one is brave enough to skip the meeting, even though none of the bosses
> are going to attend.
>
> Actually, I think the latter clause is incorrect usage. The verb's subject is
> "none," not "bosses"; since the subject is singular, the verb form should be
> singular as well. It "feels wrong" to have a singular verb immediately after a
> plural noun, but that noun properly belongs to the preposition, not the verb.
>
> I'm voting for "none of the bosses is going to attend."

None is a bit of an odd case, since it reflects the plurality of the associated noun.

None of the group is going...
None of the groups are going...
None of the bosses are going to attend.

Some, most, all also follow that pattern:
All of the group is...
All of the bosses are...

Group allows for both the plural and similar case since even one group still has multiple members (at least it implies such).

Jon

> hjh
>
>

Strunk & White 3rd edition p9:

  With none, use the singular verb when the word means "no one" or "not
   one."

     None of us are perfect.     None of us is perfect.

   A plural verb is commonly used when none suggests more than one thing
   or person.

     None are so fallible as those who are sure they're right.


Alan

-- 
Alan L Tyree                    http://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
Tel:  04 2748 6206              sip:typhoon@iptel.org
--------------000806020603090504090109--