From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: [RFC] Org syntax (draft) Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 16:05:28 +0100 Message-ID: <51E5ABB8-946C-46BE-991A-A08CED051C14@gmail.com> References: <8738w7c5fh.fsf@gmail.com> <87vc913oh5.fsf@yahoo.fr> <87y5dxzgvo.fsf@gmail.com> <393C6EDB-3795-42F0-909A-28205E6D6B73@gmail.com> <87hakkzlbd.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50119) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UELL2-00059i-3M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 10:05:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UELKx-0001uk-7J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 10:05:31 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]:60585) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UELKw-0001uc-UZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 10:05:27 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t11so2197725wey.28 for ; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 07:05:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87hakkzlbd.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Nicolas Richard , Waldemar Quevedo , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 9.3.2013, at 15:42, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, >=20 > Carsten Dominik writes: >=20 >> On 9.3.2013, at 11:52, Waldemar Quevedo = wrote: >>=20 >>> Hey Nicolas, this looks very detailed and I think it could be useful >>> for people trying to write other parsers implementations for = org-mode. >>> Thanks for sharing! >>=20 >> Maybe someone knowledgeable can turn Nicola's description into >> a formal parser description that can then be used by something like >> yacc to produce code for arbitrary languages? I am not sure if I am >> making sense though. >=20 > *cough* you mean GNU Bison Told you I am not sure if I am making sense. Anyway, a general parser would be useful for extensions like org-ruby... - Carsten=