From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_R=F6hler?= <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de>
Subject: Re: How to set C-o back to open-line?
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 07:53:09 +0200
Message-ID: <5195C5C5.3050705@easy-emacs.de>
References: <87k3mysg8c.fsf@earlgrey.lan>,
	<20130516231012.GB8732@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com>
	<87ip2is5ku.fsf@earlgrey.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41880)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de>) id 1UdDYw-0006D6-Bl
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2013 01:50:47 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de>) id 1UdDYr-0006gT-LA
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2013 01:50:42 -0400
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:57389)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de>) id 1UdDYr-0006gI-B1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2013 01:50:37 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87ip2is5ku.fsf@earlgrey.lan>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Am 17.05.2013 04:28, schrieb Christopher Allan Webber:
> Suvayu Ali writes:
>
>> Hello Christopher,
>>
>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 05:38:11PM -0500, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
>>> I really hate org-open-line... I can see why people might want it, but
>>> it's messed up my workflow.  I'd like to set C-o back.
>>>
>>> However, I have no idea what org-defkey is doing, but I expected this to
>>> work:
>>>
>>>    (define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-o") 'open-line)
>>>
>>> it isn't working!
>>>
>>> How to get the standard-ol-open-line behavior back?
>>
>> Does using org-defkey instead make it work?
>
> org-defkey doesn't seem to work.
>
>> That said, I'm curious what is so different about org-open-line?  The
>> docstring says the following:
>>
>>    It is bound to C-o, <insertline>.
>>
>>    (org-open-line N)
>>
>>    Insert a new row in tables, call `open-line' elsewhere.
>>
>> So unless you are in a table, it should be the same as normal.  Is that
>> broken?  Anyway, I never use open-line myself, but I was curious after I
>> saw several people mention it on unrelated threads on a few lists.
>>
>> Cheers,
>
> Right, exactly.  The way I use org-diet often involves me splitting
> apart and rejoining tables and the whole "adding a new line in between"
> is part of expected behavior for me.  The new system is driving me crazy!
>
>

Installing this instead should fix it:

(defun org-open-line (n)
   "Insert a new row in tables, call `open-line' elsewhere.
With \C-u NUMBER `open-line' is called the common way also in table context"
   (interactive "*P")
   (cond (n
          (open-line (prefix-numeric-value n)))
         ((org-at-table-p)
          (org-table-insert-row))
         (t (open-line (prefix-numeric-value n)))))

Cheers,

Andreas