From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBSw7ZobGVy?= <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de>
Subject: Re: :session question
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 07:41:44 +0100
Message-ID: <51514328.5010602@easy-emacs.de>
References: <51501AF2.1070405@easy-emacs.de>
	<loom.20130326T004901-561@post.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56915)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de>) id 1UKNYj-00054v-C3
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 02:40:38 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de>) id 1UKNYi-0007jI-96
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 02:40:37 -0400
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:53763)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de>) id 1UKNYi-0007iy-0I
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 02:40:36 -0400
In-Reply-To: <loom.20130326T004901-561@post.gmane.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Michael Gauland <mikelygee@no8wireless.co.nz>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>

Am 26.03.2013 00:58, schrieb Michael Gauland:
> Andreas Röhler <andreas.roehler <at> easy-emacs.de> writes:
>
>> Would find it more natural if ":session" is the default, while a command
> "refresh" makes a new one.
>
> I don't think so, but perhaps I'm just used to the way it works now.  I use a
> mix of session and non-session blocks. When I use plantuml, dot, or asymptote to
> generate images, I don't use sessions (I'm not sure these languages even support
> sessions).

Which is a strong argument for the present explicit way. Otherwise it would be hard to detect if
results are kept or not.

Thanks,

Andreas

I almost always use sessions for R, because I want to use the same
> data in different blocks. I also generally use sessions for Racket (scheme),
> even when I don't to share data across blocks, so I don't need to wait for the
> interpreter to start up for each block.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Mike Gauland
>
>
>