From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Randby <srandby@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Support Freemind/Freeplane export
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:52:30 -0400
Message-ID: <513CAC3E.3040305@gmail.com>
References: <87r4jxr834.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip59xz4i.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87lia51llv.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87r4jwjs41.fsf@gmail.com>
	<86lia454oz.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60149)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <srandby@gmail.com>) id 1UEiY7-0003G1-Q9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:52:37 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <srandby@gmail.com>) id 1UEiY6-0007o7-PD
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:52:35 -0400
Received: from mail-ie0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233]:38483)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <srandby@gmail.com>) id 1UEiY6-0007nq-Jg
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:52:34 -0400
Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id k11so3794101iea.24
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 08:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <86lia454oz.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On 03/03/2013 08:33 PM, François Pinard wrote:
> Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> How many people are going to read HTML code?  [...]  In short, the
>> concern you have raised is more cosmetic than functional.
> 
> Replying to the org-mode mailing list.  I did not closely followed the
> discussion, so maybe I'm missing the point.
> 
> A lot of people are not going to read HTML, but it does not mean that
> nobody does.  Many people still read HTML code, for a variety of
> reasons.  I find HTML code should stay as legible as possible.

I agree. I read the HTML code that org generates and there other are
people who read the same code and don't use org. Legibility of the code
generated by org is a necessity for me.

Scott Randby