From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xue Fuqiao Subject: Re: org-export raises stringp nil error Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:56:41 +0800 Message-ID: <513999B9.6090901@gmail.com> References: <87ip539io1.fsf@nautilus.nautilus> <87zjye96ph.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87vc928kcm.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87vc92735x.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87vc92735x.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Lele Gaifax , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Leo Liu , emacs-devel@gnu.org List-Id: emacs-orgmode.gnu.org On 03/08/2013 03:37 PM, Bastien wrote: >> I think org-mode is better in ELPA, a better distribution channel than >> the core for things like org-mode. Bundling it in emacs doesn't help >> anybody. > I strongly think otherwise: Emacs needs a good outline and editing > tool. outline.el is not usable enough and I can see no other Emacs > tool than Org-mode for exporting to HTML/LaTeX/ODT easily. I agree. And I think some packages in GNU ELPA like AUCTeX and js2-mode should also be contained. The built-in modes for editing TeX related files and EMCAScript are not quite usable. > I understand the temptation in terms of maintainance, but I think > maintainance problems should not take priority over usefulness of > the code. +1 -- Best regards, Xue Fuqiao. http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/XueFuqiao