From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Moyer Subject: Block agendas and filtering Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 22:46:09 -0500 Message-ID: <5136BC01.8060302@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53372) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UD5Qq-0003Sw-O7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 22:54:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UD5Qp-00021P-E1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 22:54:20 -0500 Received: from mail-qe0-f43.google.com ([209.85.128.43]:49558) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UD5Iv-0000QX-24 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 22:46:09 -0500 Received: by mail-qe0-f43.google.com with SMTP id 1so4953525qee.16 for ; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 19:46:07 -0800 (PST) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Is it possible to have a block agenda that contains two daily/weekly agendas that are "opposites" of each other, based on something like a tag? For example I have my normal todo list things that are scheduled, and then I have other regular things, like cleaning and taking care of other tasks that occur every week. Below is an example * Tasks ** File paperwork SCHEDULED: <2013-05-17 Fri> ** Build model airplane SCHEDULED: <2013-05-18 Sat> * Regular chores :chores: ** Dishes <%%(member (calendar-day-of-week date) '(0 1 2 3 4 5 6))> ** Laundry <%%(= 6 (calendar-day-of-week date))> What I want is a block agenda, using two agenda blocks. The first will *exclude* the entrys tagged as :chores: and the second will *include* any entry that is tagged with :chores:. Is there a way to accomplish this with tags, or maybe properties? Thanks! -Tom