From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Thum <simon.thum@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: Sexp aganda entries broken?
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:09:51 +0100
Message-ID: <509E8A5F.3080403@gmx.de>
References: <50998D60.300@gmx.de> <509DA8C2.9000502@gmx.de>
	<87ehk1da0y.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35272)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <simon.thum@gmx.de>) id 1TXDdC-0003UZ-Ul
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 11:10:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <simon.thum@gmx.de>) id 1TXDd9-0006yV-NO
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 11:10:02 -0500
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:52410)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <simon.thum@gmx.de>) id 1TXDd9-0006yP-D2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 11:09:59 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87ehk1da0y.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>, emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

On 11/10/2012 11:31 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Simon Thum<simon.thum@gmx.de>  writes:
>
>> To prevent further breakage, I am attaching a doc fix. I hope it is
>> useable?
>
> This is already documented in section 10.3.1 (Calendar/Diary
> integration) of the manual. I don't think it's useful to drop another
> note there.

I know that, but I deemed it useful to document it as a related but 
separate mechanism on its own merit. Perhaps there could be a link to 
10.3.1 to make it clear that the notations differ in important ways?

Cheers,

Simon


>
> Thanks for your patch, though.
>
>
> Regards,
>