From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Christopher J. White" Subject: Re: can't find org-version? Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 07:48:21 -0700 Message-ID: <5044C335.4090004@grierwhite.com> References: <878vcrkbuu.fsf@jnanam.net> <1346657034.96590.YahooMailNeo@web29806.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Reply-To: orgmode@grierwhite.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46005) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T8Xwy-0005ta-QL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 10:48:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T8Xwx-0006sC-9z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 10:48:28 -0400 Received: from mail222c25.carrierzone.com ([64.29.147.236]:52164) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T8Xwx-0006rc-3u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 10:48:27 -0400 Received: from cwhite-mbpro.local (c-68-35-171-45.hsd1.nm.comcast.net [68.35.171.45]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail222c25.carrierzone.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q83EmL2H009216 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 14:48:23 GMT In-Reply-To: <1346657034.96590.YahooMailNeo@web29806.mail.ird.yahoo.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org I'm the maintainer of the org-toodledo and the OP did indeed contact me first. org-toodledo effectively does: (require 'org) Then uses the variable org-version. This has worked just fine for a few years, but when the OP upgraded to 7.9, the org-toodledo function that checks the org-version yields an error along the lines of variable not defined. I did some googling and came across these threads which seemed relevant: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/59337 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/55412 It seems wrong to me that hacking org-toodledo is the appropriate solution. As mentioned in one of the above threads, the version of a package is pretty fundamental and I'd expect it to be provided by the base require. ...cj On 9/3/12 12:23 AM, Giovanni Ridolfi wrote: > Da: Benjamin Slade >> Since updating to org 7.9, I've had an odd problem with another package that depends on org-mode (org-toodledo). >> It reports that it can't find org-version. > > So the problem is in org-toodledo. Did you ask its maintainer?