From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
Subject: Re: org-read-date minibuffer bindings:
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 08:21:28 +0200
Message-ID: <4d30c0ab33774535ba142853bf467a44@science.uva.nl>
References: <18140.49928.628034.424629@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IST7L-0004db-0G
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 03:46:35 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IST7K-0004c1-G9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 03:46:34 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IST7K-0004br-4d
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 03:46:34 -0400
Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <dominik@science.uva.nl>) id 1IST7J-00011P-Qz
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 03:46:33 -0400
In-Reply-To: <18140.49928.628034.424629@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: raman@users.sf.net
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>


On Sep 4, 2007, at 4:29, T. V. Raman wrote:

> For all date/calendar related things, down-arrow moves forward,
> up-arrow back --- except in the  keybindings set up for
> org-time-stamp through org-shiftup and org-shiftdown
>
> In some sense, the binding used there -- up-arrow increases
> down-arrow decreases field under point makes local sense, but is
> globally confusing.

You are right, I have been irritated by this as well, without
knowing why.  I modeled it after the typical number selection
item in widgets that usually have little arrow on the side that
you can click.

But now you are telling me the reason of my confusion:  In the
calenda and in the agenda, down means later.

I am hesitant to change the default for this (would to after
massive voting), but there will be an option
`org-edit-timestamp-down-means-later' in the next version.

Thanks!

- Carsten