From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Riley Subject: Re: Results of the SourceForge Community Award Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:20:10 +0200 Message-ID: <4a6e362b.0305560a.281a.04c6@mx.google.com> References: <87prbqmjro.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87r5w2mhs3.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <5769.1248703484@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <878wi9bvbv.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MVZUO-0006pr-3n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:20:16 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MVZUL-0006pE-UH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:20:15 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47085 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MVZUL-0006pB-RJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:20:13 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]:39292) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MVZUL-0003P7-B2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:20:13 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l27so558940fgb.7 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:20:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <878wi9bvbv.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:57:44 +0800") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: > Nick Dokos writes: > >> Indeed. BTW, I was curious to see what PortableApps did/looked like, and >> (since I couldn't find an installation package for Linux) I downloaded >> the sources and looked at them: this thing seems to be Windoze only >> (maybe Mac too?) - is that true or did I overlook something? > > To me that's true - I was a bit surprised too. > > Mmhh... maybe the Windows user-base is bigger than the Emacs user-base? > >> PS. And if so, shouldn't the FTC come after them for false advertising? >> PortableApps indeed :-) > > :) Come on chaps, you can run Windows under Vmware or VirtualBox you know!