From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Christopher J. White" Subject: Re: Org Mode TOOD two way sync tool Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:05:22 -0400 Message-ID: <4FE47BA2.8010406@grierwhite.com> References: <4FE45EF9.8040307@grierwhite.com> Reply-To: orgmode@grierwhite.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54217) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Si4UR-0001ic-UJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:05:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Si4UK-0002EU-UB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:05:35 -0400 Received: from mail239c25.carrierzone.com ([64.29.147.231]:39474) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Si4UK-0002DY-O7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:05:28 -0400 Received: from cwhite-mbpro.local (pool-108-49-0-126.bstnma.east.verizon.net [108.49.0.126]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail239c25.carrierzone.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q5ME5N4Q021878 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:05:25 GMT In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Karra, On 6/22/12 8:33 AM, Sriram Karra wrote: > Chris, thanks for the pointer to org-toodledo. Does org-toodledo's > handle all the options and formats of possible TODOs supported by org > mode? That's a loaded question ;-) I'd have to say probably not, but it so far supports all of my TODOs. Brief list of properties handled: * TODO state * DEADLINE / SCHEDULED with repeaters * CLOSED * tags * Effort * hierarchy * folder (toodledo folders, that is) - map to a heading I'd say extending support to other properties wouldn't be too hard if it's a direct mapping that doesn't involve too much logic. > Are you yet to implement support for anything that is parsed by > the Emacs org-mode? I'm not sure what you mean -- are you referring to org-element? If not, can you clarify? ...cj