From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Thum <simon.thum@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: Possible bug in parsing / clarification of syntax
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 17:38:40 +0200
Message-ID: <4FAFD580.30104@gmx.de>
References: <4F53DEF7.8080604@gmx.de> <87aa2j4hoj.fsf@gnu.org>
	<4F8C671A.1090105@gmx.de> <87pqae27m0.fsf@altern.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47294)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <simon.thum@gmx.de>) id 1STasf-0002g8-BR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2012 11:38:46 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <simon.thum@gmx.de>) id 1STasd-0005R6-OR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2012 11:38:44 -0400
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:49881)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <simon.thum@gmx.de>) id 1STasd-0005Qx-E7
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2012 11:38:43 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87pqae27m0.fsf@altern.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: Charles Sebold <Charles.Sebold@lcms.org>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Bastien,

I have not checked master but on maint it still exists. Do you need any 
more details to reproduce?

Cheers,

Simon


On 05/08/2012 02:13 PM, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Simon Thum<simon.thum@gmx.de>  writes:
>
>> I have to revoke my earlier statement. The patch does _not_ remove the
>> TODO_ line from the agenda. I see no change at all.
>
> This should be fixed now.
>
> Thanks,
>