From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marc-Oliver Ihm <marc-oliver.ihm@online.de>
Subject: Re: [babel] #+call-line removes hlines and headings ?
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:21:19 +0100
Message-ID: <4F2555DF.8030808@online.de>
References: <jg2uqn$h6j$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<87ipju6b9b.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36086)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <marc-oliver.ihm@online.de>) id 1RrVdH-0000hD-1y
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:21:31 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <marc-oliver.ihm@online.de>) id 1RrVdC-0006T4-RI
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:21:26 -0500
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:64585)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <marc-oliver.ihm@online.de>) id 1RrVdC-0006Sy-Ig
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:21:22 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87ipju6b9b.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Am 29.01.2012 11:42, schrieb Andreas Leha:
> :colnames yes
Hi Andreas,

Thanx, that is definitely a solution !

And I agree with you, that its a bit puzzling, that both cases behave differently;
the #+call-line should just have the same result as the #+begin_src-line, to which after all
it just refers. Beeing able to change the behaviour of the #+call-line with header arguments is
of course a good thing, but it should not be necessary here in the first place.

However, this would require a patch to the babel-code, which I am currently not able to produce, because I already
got lost in debugging this problem :-) And of course I am not sure what would be the side effects of changing this
behaviour ...

So, thanx again for pointing out this very easy workaround !


with kind regards, Marc-Oliver Ihm