From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBSw7ZobGVy?= <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de>
Subject: Re: org2info, docu workflow
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 08:11:00 +0100
Message-ID: <4ECF3F84.5060201@easy-emacs.de>
References: <4ECE0B25.4020703@easy-emacs.de> <m162i9mojt.fsf@tsdye.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50718)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de>) id 1RTpwG-0004DI-IG
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 02:11:13 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de>) id 1RTpwF-00042J-ID
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 02:11:12 -0500
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:51112)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de>) id 1RTpwF-00042E-5x
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 02:11:11 -0500
In-Reply-To: <m162i9mojt.fsf@tsdye.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Am 24.11.2011 18:13, schrieb Thomas S. Dye:
> Aloha Andreas,
>
> FWIW, I looked into this a while back and couldn't find an easy path
> from org to info.  Caveat emptor, absence of evidence isn't evidence of
> absence.  Others on the list probably have a better handle on this.
>
> The most promising path seemed to be export to docbook,


Hi,

thanks, that's the direction it went here. Even thinking on the long run 
writing in docbook from the scratch might be faster than from org or 
reST, as from inside an ML must not care for formatting, while tagging 
might be automated.


  but I couldn't get
> the docbook to info step working with what seemed at the time reasonable
> effort

Seeing a whole bunch of tools docbook2... (some tex) still hopefully.


Andreas